| |||
|
Arts & Entertainment Books Comics Health & Body Media Mothers Who Think People Politics2000 Technology - Free Software Travel & Food ![]() Columnists
Current Click here to read the latest stories from the wires. - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - Also Today For a full list of today's Salon News stories, go to the
News home page. - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon - - - - - - - - - - - - Recently in Salon News
Is Hatfield the real McCoy?
Money talks, reform walks
The end of a nightmare
Back to the eve of destruction?
"Fortunate Son": Better and worse than you might expect - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Another Dole bites the dust
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Oct. 20, 1999 | WASHINGTON --
"The current political calendar and election laws favor those who get an early
start and can tap into huge private fortunes, or have a pre-existing network of
political supporters," Dole said, referring to the richest of her former
opponents, gazillionaire Steve Forbes and front-running Texas Gov. George W. Bush.
Bush and Forbes "enjoy a 75- or 80-to-1 cash advantage" over her, she said.
"Perhaps I could handle 2-to-1 or 10-to-1, but not 80-to-1!" According to FEC reports filed last week, Dole has raised just under $5 million
in her campaign, and has $860,000 cash on hand, placing her fifth in the GOP fund-raising contest. Bush has raised more than $57 million, with more than $37
million on hand; Forbes has raised $20 million (including $16.4 million of his own
money), with $1.8 million on hand; Arizona Sen. John McCain has raised $9.4 million with $2.1 million on hand;
and Gary Bauer has raised $6.2 million with just $284,434 in cash on hand. While Dole's cash disadvantage was no doubt a major factor in her campaign's
inability to catch fire, Republican observers pointed out a number of problems
that were self-inflicted. With celebrity and notoriety on her side, critics say, Dole never came to the microphone with anything worth saying. "She might have had a chance to achieve some success, but she never built on it,"
said William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard. "The window she
had was that she's a woman, the first 'serious' female candidate, so a lot of
people were interested in her." Since Bush is so far ahead in both name I.D. and wallet size, Kristol said, his
challengers need to offer a credible contrast with him. "You need an argument
against the front-runner," he said. "There's a credible argument to be made to
Republican primary voters that if you think Bush is too light you should go to
McCain. Or if you think Bush is too moderate, you go to
Forbes or Bauer … But there's really no difference between [Dole] and Bush
in terms of issues or even tenor. They're both moderate-conservative Republican
establishment types." "As [GOP pollster] Kellyanne Fitzpatrick said, 'When your choices are vanilla and
French vanilla, what's so appealing about French vanilla?'" said Sheila Moloney,
executive director of the conservative Eagle Forum. "I can't really think of any
way that Liddy Dole distinguished herself from George W. Bush. She's a nice lady,
but I'm not sure why she thought she was offering us anything new." Others were harsher in their criticism. "Liddy Dole puts the GOP in a quandary,"
said a female Republican official. "Republicans want her to run, to help appeal
to women. Keeping her in the race for as long as possible is very important for how the party is perceived, to help bring women back in the fold for the GOP.
But then since Dole had no ideas, her agenda-less candidacy left her with nothing
but her nontraditional appeal to women. If she doesn't have the ideas to support
her candidacy, then her appeal is meaningless." Moloney agreed: "You've got to run on something besides the fact that you wear dresses."
| ||
|
|
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.