Salon Urge

 

 

T H E_.H O T_.S P O T

A call to hearts
By Susie Bright
Being single on Valentine's Day doesn't have to be a downer
(02/05/99)

 

___________________

The Technology of Orgasm
___________________

 

R E C E N T L Y

Dr. Block's little house of sexual horrors
By Carol Lloyd
A grotesque L.A. event proves that when it comes to being unsexy, it's really hard to beat sex
(02/18/99)

Decade of the dick
By Deanne Stillman
Bobbing from one scandal to the next, the male member has seized center stage at the close of the millennium
(02/11/99)

Boogie bites
By Jenn Shreve
Porn star activists want to pave the way for a new era of enlightened porn ... but isn't this an oxymoron?
(02/04/99)

Strap-on epiphany
By Virginia Vitzthum
In becoming the penetrator, a woman learns to see sex -- and the world -- through male eyes
(01/28/99)

Confessions of an office pervert
By Angie Monroe
In satisfying her own nasty desires, one woman discovers the key to worker productivity
(01/21/99)


- - - - - - - - - -

Browse the
Urge archives

- - - - - - - - - -

 

 

 

D O C T O R ' S _O R D E R S
___________________- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
urge image
In the wake of a new Alabama law declaring vibrators illegal, a provocative new book, "The Technology of Orgasm," sheds light on the perversely puritanical evolution of the feminine joystick.

BY JANELLE BROWN | Nestled in a scarf in my friend's drawer, conveniently located just an arm's length from her bed, are three vibrators -- a large purple jelly dildo, ridged, with a kinked "g-spot head"; a plastic "personal mini-massager" the size of a tube of lipstick, which she calls the "Pocket Rocket"; and an egg-shaped vibrator with a remote.

If my friend were to buy this collection in Alabama, not only would she be breaking the law, but whoever sold her the goods could be slapped with a $10,000 fine and up to a year in prison. Unless, of course, they could convince the pleasure police that she was using those vibrators to, uh, relax the aching muscles in her neck.

In April 1998, Alabama passed an addition to the obscenity statute of the state law that "makes it unlawful to produce, distribute or otherwise sell sexual devices that are marketed primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs." Part of a bigger bill restricting licenses for strip clubs, the law argues that these sex toys are obscene and appeal to a "prurient interest." Last week, the ACLU and five women challenged the law in court as a violation of privacy -- since neither masturbation nor genital stimulation are illegal (yet). The five women included an erotica shop owner and a woman who holds immensely popular "Tupperware parties" peddling sex toys to Midwestern housewives. The judge has yet to release his decision.

The premise itself is loaded with both hypocrisy and latent misogyny. There is, the Alabama officials wrote, "no fundamental right to purchase a product to use in pursuit of having an orgasm." What they should have written is that women have no fundamental right to purchase a product to use in pursuit of having an orgasm. Because while those veined, flesh-colored pseudo-penises are not legal, those displays of crotchless panties -- not to mention Viagra -- are perfectly OK.

As the ACLU's memorandum argues, the Alabama obscenity code shouldn't be applied to "objects which in and of themselves do not depict sexual conduct or appeal to the prurient interest ... They are nothing more than what they purport to be -- aids to enhance or improve sex." As ACLU staff attorney Mark Lopez summed it up, "I don't think they're concerned about the deleterious effect these stores have on the community. They just banned vibrators altogether, apparently because they didn't like people using them."

Presumably, the vibrator is banned as being obscene because it "lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value" -- the constitutional definition for obscenity. But the irony of the Alabama law lies not in the evident hypocrisy, but in the history of the vibrator itself, which according to Rachel P. Maines in her new book, "The Technology of Orgasm," was originally conceived as a serious medical device.

N E X T+P A G E | "Therapeutic massage" to cure "hysteria"

 



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Become a Salon member. Click here.

 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VIBRATOR PHOTO COURTESY OF GOOD VIBRATIONS

 
 

 
 
Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.