Maybe it doesn't take professional economists to draw the conclusion that Bush's proposal to make tax cuts for the wealthy a permanent state of affairs isn't the brightest idea in this time of massive deficits. But two Brookings Institution scholars have released a paper laying out the experts' argument against Bush's plan. "Making the tax cuts permanent would be regressive and would dig a fiscal hole over the next 75 years that is as big as the combined Social Security and Medicare trust fund shortfalls over the same period," they say.
Digging a hole
Published February 26, 2004 5:40PM (EST)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/362f5/362f545c492419fcfe0653a91c73255ae6cee1b4" alt=""
By Geraldine Sealey
Geraldine Sealey is senior news editor at Salon.com.
MORE FROM Geraldine Sealey
Shares