Help keep Salon independent

New Jersey Supreme Court: State must allow same-sex unions

Is this the break the GOP needed?

Published

Salon Default

It’s not exactly an October surprise, but the New Jersey Supreme Court has just handed the GOP the sticks it needs to light a fire under the religious right: In a divided ruling, the court says that “denying rights and benefits to committed same-sex couples that are statutorily given to their heterosexual counterparts violates the equal protection guarantee” of the state’s Constitution.

Translation: New Jersey must let gay couples marry — or at least do something by some other name that carries with it all the benefits and responsibilities of the marriages the state recognizes among heterosexuals.

From the majority opinion: “To comply with this constitutional mandate, the legislature must either amend the marriage statutes to include same-sex couples or create a parallel statutory structure, which will provide for, on equal terms, the rights and benefits enjoyed and burdens and obligations borne by married couples. We will not presume that a separate statutory scheme, which uses a title other than marriage, contravenes equal protection principles, so long as the rights and benefits of civil marriage are made equally available to same-sex couples. The name to be given to the statutory scheme that provides full rights and benefits to same-sex couples, whether marriage or some other term, is a matter left to the democratic process.”

One more detail to inflame the right: The majority opinion was written by Justice Barry Albin, who was nominated to the court by former Gov. Jim McGreevey.

By Tim Grieve

Tim Grieve is a senior writer and the author of Salon's War Room blog.

MORE FROM Tim Grieve

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Related Articles