Trump defenders downplay evidence of Russian collusion: "So what?"

Tucker Carlson and friends insist that colluding with a foreign adversary to win an election is not a big deal

Published July 28, 2018 10:25AM (EDT)

More and more evidence is mounting in the case against President Donald Trump and Russia's meddling in the 2016 election. The latest information from Trump's own attorney, Michael Cohen, indicates that the president knew in advance about the June 2016 meeting in Trump Tower between his son and Kremlin-connected Russians. It is the most persuasive proof yet that the president had knowledge of Russia's intentions to influence the election.

Some Americans don't seem to care. Many right-wing pundits and politicos have tried to wave off the significance of this evidence. National Review editor Andrew McCarthy, for example, told Fox News viewers on Thursday that it would be acceptable for the Trump campaign to "turn to foreign governments for dirt."

Federalist editor Mollie Hemmingway, meanwhile, told her Twitter followers she didn't "have a problem" with presidential candidates "getting dirt on election opponents from foreigners."

On Friday night, Tucker Carlson was the latest Trump sycophant to endorse lite treason.

"It's hard to see the point of all of this hysteria," he said on his show.

"What exactly would the crime here be? It's not illegal to talk to foreigners," he continued. "Nobody's claiming that any information changed hands. And even it did, so what?"

Like Hemmingway, Carlson attempted to equate what the Trump campaign allegedly did to the Hillary Clinton campaign's attempt to dig up information on Russia's election interference, which came in the form of the Christopher Steele dossier.

Carlson said the dossier was "based on misinformation," despite the fact that much of the content in the dossier has been verified by U.S. officials.

No one is exactly surprised that Carlson and other right-wing commentators are trying to normalize collusion with a foreign adversary. Trump's defenders have continuously moved the goalposts when it comes to the Russia-election story. First, they insisted the Trump Tower meeting never happened. Then they conceded the meeting did happen, but it was not about the presidential election. Now that there is concrete evidence that the Trump campaign was aware of Russian meddling, the state of play is to ask: "So what?"

To end his segment Friday, Carlson tried to explain to his audience what the Democrats were doing by propping up the Robert Mueller investigation.

"It's a political tactic," Carlson said. "You scream as loud as you can in the hope that your opponents will be intimidated into accepting your fraudulent premise."

Fox News viewers should heed Carlson's warning. He knows exactly what he's talking about.

Watch Carlson's full interference campaign below:


By Taylor Link

MORE FROM Taylor Link