Chief Justice Roberts halts "dark money" finance ruling

The move lets anonymous campaign donors remain hidden

Published September 17, 2018 8:40PM (EDT)

FILE - This Jan. 28, 2014 file photo shows Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in the House chamber on Capitol Hill waiting for the President's State of the Union address to begin. Roberts is beginning his 10th year at the head of the Supreme Court, and the fifth with the same lineup of justices. He has been part of a five-justice conservative majority that has rolled back campaign finance limits, upheld abortion restrictions and been generally skeptical of the consideration of race in public life. But his court has taken a different path in cases involving gay and lesbian Americans, despite the chief justice's opposition most of the time. (AP Photo/Larry Downing, Pool) (AP)
FILE - This Jan. 28, 2014 file photo shows Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in the House chamber on Capitol Hill waiting for the President's State of the Union address to begin. Roberts is beginning his 10th year at the head of the Supreme Court, and the fifth with the same lineup of justices. He has been part of a five-justice conservative majority that has rolled back campaign finance limits, upheld abortion restrictions and been generally skeptical of the consideration of race in public life. But his court has taken a different path in cases involving gay and lesbian Americans, despite the chief justice's opposition most of the time. (AP Photo/Larry Downing, Pool) (AP)

Read more articles from the DC Report here.
dcr-logo

Chief Justice John Roberts halted a federal judge’s order that invalidated a Federal Election Commission regulation that has allowed donors to dark-money groups to be anonymous.

The ruling by U.S. District Court Chief Judge Beryl Howell was supposed to take effect Monday. A three-judge D.C. Circuit panel turned down the same arguments for a stay.

The FEC regulation in dispute requires disclosure only when a donor designates his or her money for a specific independent expenditure, but does not require donors’ identities to be made public under other conditions, including when they seek to support or oppose an individual candidate.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington sued the FEC after Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS failed to disclose the names of contributors behind its effort to defeat Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, in 2012.

It’s not clear whether Roberts’ order is a short-term measure intended to allow further consideration of the issue by the justices or whether it will remain in place during the fall midterm elections.

The Year of the Woman

A record 256 women are running for the House and Senate this year, but that may not translate into a record number of women in office. It is possible that the number of women could actually decline or remain about the same in Congress and in governors’ offices.

The best chances for women to make history are in the House, where Democratic women won primaries at a higher rate than any other group, male or female. Women of color make up one-third of all House candidates, also a record.

Most of the female candidates running in the House are in districts that favor the other party, either running for open seats or challenging incumbents.

Currently, women hold 84 of the 435 seats in the House. The large number of Democratic female nominees in the House reflects the energy of the women’s marches against Trump and the historic gender gap among voters who elected him.

There are 22 women running in Senate contests this year, up from the previous record 18 in 2012. Eleven of those are favored to win.

Florida felons may get a voting reprieve

A ballot amendment in the November election could restore voting rights to 1.5 million felons in Florida, more than 10% of the state’s voting-age citizens.

The amendment would give all former felons, except for convicted murderers and sex offenders, the right to vote once they complete all terms of their sentence. To pass, at least 60% of the state’s voters must support it.

Nearly all states restrict felons’ right to vote, a practice that began in America’s colonial period. Only Maine and Vermont allow felons to vote while in prison. Two other states, Iowa and Kentucky, automatically and permanently ban felons from voting.

Felon voting restrictions didn’t affect a significant number of people until the 1970s and 1980s with the rise of mass incarceration.

Top Trending

Check out the major news stories of the day


By Sarah Okeson

MORE FROM Sarah Okeson


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Campaign Finance Chief Justice John Roberts Dark Money Dc Report Fec Federal Election Commission Voting