COMMENTARY

Trump and Mike Pompeo's parting outrage: Falsely accusing Cuba of sponsoring terrorism

Placing Cuba back on the list of "state sponsors of terror" is pure politics — and a poison pill for Biden's team

Published January 13, 2021 5:00AM (EST)

Mike Pompeo | Cuban flag (Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images)
Mike Pompeo | Cuban flag (Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images)

On Jan. 11, in his final days before leaving office, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo added one parting blow to the series of bludgeons his administration has inflicted on Cuba for four years: putting the island on the list of "state sponsors of terror" that includes only Iran, North Korea and Syria. The designation drew swift condemnation from policymakers and humanitarian groups as "politically motivated." It comes six years after the previous administration had removed Cuba from the same list as part of Barack Obama's policy of rapprochement. 

In the six years since then, Donald Trump's State Department could not point to a single act of terror sponsored by Cuba. Instead, Pompeo based his decision on Cuba's alleged support for the ELN (National Liberation Army – Colombia's second-largest guerrilla group) and the harboring of a handful of U.S. fugitives wanted for crimes committed in the 1970s, including renowned Black revolutionary Assata Shakur. Lacking more specific accusations, the State Department criticized Cuba for its supposed "malign interference in Venezuela and the rest of the Western Hemisphere."

These claims don't stand up to scrutiny. Regarding the ELN, the gist of the story is that the Trump administration is punishing Cuba for its role in attempting to bring peace to the long-simmering conflict in Colombia. ELN negotiators arrived in Cuba in 2018 for peace talks with the Colombian government. As part of the protocols for these meetings, ELN negotiators were allowed entry into Cuba and promised safe passage back into Colombia after their conclusion. Guarantor countries, including Cuba and Norway, assumed responsibility for their safe return. The talks collapsed in January 2019 following an ELN car bombing in Bogotá that killed 22 people. Colombia requested the extradition of the negotiators, but Cuba refused because the Colombian government would not honor the previous government's commitment to guaranteeing the negotiators' freedom upon returning home.

Regarding Pompeo's other arguments, Cuba's main influence in the Western Hemisphere has been the opposite of "malign": it has deployed its doctors throughout the region and the world, saving thousands of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. And when it comes to harboring terrorists, it's worth noting that for decades the United States harbored Luis Posada Carriles, a Cuban exile and CIA agent who masterminded of a 1973 bombing that killed 73 people on a Cuban commercial airliner. 

Cuba's placement on the list of state sponsors of terror is meant to be a thorn in any plan by Joe Biden's incoming administration for rapprochement. Taking Cuba off the list will require a review process that could take months, delaying any new initiatives to roll back Trump-era policies. It will also cause further pain to Cuba's economy, already battered by tightened sanctions and the pandemic that has devastated the island's tourism industry. The new terrorism label will likely scare off many businesses that import to Cuba, banks that finance transactions with Cuba and foreign investors. 

A week before the designation, nine U.S. senators wrote to Pompeo and warned that such a step "will politicize our national security." It has drawn strong condemnation from Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who said it made a "mockery of what had been a credible, objective measure," and House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., who said the hypocrisy from President Trump, less than a week after he incited a domestic terror attack against the U.S. Capitol, was "stunning but not surprising." 

Faith group Pastors For Peace was one of many organizations to condemn the designation: "We know that this latest act, in the waning days of the Trump administration, is not only an aggressive act against Cuba, but aggression against the incoming administration who have pledged to return to a policy leading to peace and civilized relations with our island neighbor."

Policy group ACERE (of which our organization, CODEPINK, is a part) drew a connection between the designation and recent events at home: "Perpetuating the myth that Cuba is a threat to the American people — while minimizing the threat posed by far-right extremists at home — is an embarrassment to our country on the world stage."

The real motive behind this move is to offer a parting gift to the Cuban exile community and its allies, who have been loyal supporters of the Trump administration and helped oust several Democratic members of Congress (and push Trump to a surprisingly easy win in Florida) in the recent election. This is par for the course for an administration that has repeatedly used sanctions for political gain with no regard for the Cuban people who, over the past four years, have borne the brunt of sanctions affecting everything from energy, tourism, medicines, remittances and flights. Just like millions of U.S. citizens, Cubans are counting the days until the Trump administration becomes history and hoping that the next administration will offer some relief.


By Medea Benjamin

Medea Benjamin is co-founder of CODEPINK for Peace and author of several books, including "Inside Iran: The Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran." She and Nicolas J.S. Davies are the authors of "War in Ukraine: Making Sense of a Senseless Conflict."

MORE FROM Medea Benjamin

By Leonardo Flores

Leonardo Flores is a Latin American policy expert and a campaign coordinator with CODEPINK.

MORE FROM Leonardo Flores


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Antony Blinken Commentary Cuba Donald Trump Foreign Policy Joe Biden Latin America Mike Pompeo Terrorism